Que importância tem o facto desta mesma pessoa ser líder de uma ONG?
Ora, com a quantidade de ONG que são controladas pela NOM, é sempre de suspeitar, de cada vez que nos deparamos com uma destas organizações. E é também sempre de suspeitar dos seus líderes e das pessoas que as montaram.
Aqui vão algumas das causas em que estiveram envolvidos, quer a líder da ONG em causa (em ONG anteriores e na presente que lidera), quer os restantes membros desta ONG (presentemente e em actividades anteriores).
- Campanhas de apoio ao Presidente Obama.
- Campanhas que visam sabotar o financiamento da "National Rifle Association of America (NRA)" ou que visam denegrir a imagem pública desta associação, que defende o (muito importante) direito civil à autodefesa, tal como é (muito explicitamente) expresso na Segunda Emenda à Constituição dos EUA.
- Militância na "American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO)" - uma federação sindical claramente controlada pelo poder estabelecido (que servirá certamente para controlar a contestação ao mesmo).
- Campanhas de luta pelo impedimento do desenvolvimento industrial (/campanhas pseudo-ambientalistas de "protecção ambiental", que claramente jogam a favor do objectivo de "crescimento zero", pretendido pelo poder estabelecido).
- Campanha de favorecimento à imigração ilegal para os EUA (obviamente que, para destruir a qualidade de vida nos mesmos, assim como a sua identidade cultural, e para, ultimamente, destruí-los enquanto estados-nação).
- Campanha pela implementação do "Estado Social" nos EUA.
- Campanha de apoio à WikiLeaks.
- E mais toda uma série de "causas" de treta, acompanhadas de falsas lutas sem consequência prática (típicas das ONG controladas), que agora não tenho paciência para estar a listar...
E, sim... Para quem a cara na fotografia, acima e à esquerda colocada, parecer familiar... Trata-se daquela que era, na altura, a namorada do mesmo.
E, quem quiser saber de bons exemplos de confirmações do tipo de suspeita que estou a levantar, nem precisa sequer de olhar para o outro lado do Atlântico para poder ver alguns - [1] [2].
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/01/19/284445/media-bury-facts-on-us-dissident-death/
ResponderEliminarAn intelligence analyst tells Press TV that rogue elements within the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) are responsible for the assassination of American dissident Aaron Swartz. He also added that the US mainstream media has turned a blind eye to the issue.
US internet activist Aaron Swartz, who was an outspoken critic of US President Barack Obama’s policies was recently found hanged in his apartment.
The 26-year-old blogger and computer prodigy was found dead in his apartment in Brooklyn, New York City, on January 11.
Swartz died weeks before he was scheduled to face a trial on accusations of hacking a website and downloading millions of academic papers.
Brooklyn’s chief medical examiner ruled the death a ‘suicide by hanging,’ but no further details were available about the mysterious death.
Last year, Swartz openly criticized Washington and the Tel Aviv regime for launching joint cyber attacks against Iran. He was also critical of Obama’s “kill list,” a list of individuals who are suspected of terrorism by the US and are listed for targeted killing after final approval by the US president himself.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today (Ohio) to have his opinion about the issue of Swartz's death.
A rough transcription of the interview with Gordon Duff follows.
Press TV: Mr. Duff, just how is Swartz's death being treated - especially with his father now saying that "the government" has killed his son?
Duff: There is no coverage in the mainstream media at all and we have found no possible excuse to this death other than the interference of ... We are believing rogue elements within the Central Intelligence Agency are responsible.
There is no other possibility and that is a place that I go very reluctantly but I can think of no other responsible party. It has to be them. No one has this kind of power. No one would do something so obvious. There is no question that this was a murder.
Press TV: And so how is the US government itself reacting to accusations of its involvement in this death? I mean some say it killed Swartz to cover up some issues and to silence the voice of dissent?
Duff: We had the Sandy Hook killings. There is a considerable controversy about that. With all of the discussion of gun control in the US, there is no discussion of anything else at all.
The Swartz's issue has been pushed off the newspapers. Our government is very good at burying new stories. And this is what they have done with this one. They are not allowing us to have any voice in this controversy.
Press TV: And as an American citizen, how have the public reacted to his death?
Duff: 90 percent of the American public are utterly unaware of the issue because it has not been reported on mainstream news, newspapers, television. Not one word has come to the American public.
MAY/JR